Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): July
RESEARCH ARTICLES

Satellite Imagery Analysis For Landslides Prediction Via Artificial Intelligence

DOWNLOAD PDF
  • G Chitra,
  • D Ramya Sree,
  • K Amaresh,
  • C Sandeep Reddy,
  • M Jyoshna
G Chitra
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India
D Ramya Sree
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India
K Amaresh
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India
C Sandeep Reddy
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India
M Jyoshna
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15209917

Published 2025-04-14

Keywords

  • Landslide classification,
  • satellite image classification,
  • support vector machine,
  • fuzzy-based classification,
  • landslide prediction,
  • land cover classification
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

G Chitra, D Ramya Sree, K Amaresh, C Sandeep Reddy, & M Jyoshna. (2025). Satellite Imagery Analysis For Landslides Prediction Via Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Computational Learning & Intelligence, 4(3), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15209917

Copyright (c) 2025 G Chitra, D Ramya Sree, K Amaresh, C Sandeep Reddy, M Jyoshna

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Landslides in mountainous and hilly terrains arise due to both natural phenomena and human activities. Natural triggers such as excessive rainfall, seismic shifts, and soil moisture fluctuations play a major role, while human-induced factors like uncontrolled infrastructure development further amplify the risks. These occurrences lead to significant destruction of both human life and property, emphasizing the necessity of early detection to mitigate their impact. In recent years, machine learning methods have gained prominence in automating landslide identification. Various techniques, including feature extraction and classification, have been applied to satellite imagery to create semi-automated systems for predicting and detecting landslides. However, achieving fully automated detection with superior precision remains a critical challenge. One major limitation in landslide classification and prediction using satellite images is the need for a systematically structured dataset to ensure accurate and reliable testing outcomes. This study examines a range of approaches used for landslide detection and classification through satellite images, aiming to identify gaps in existing research. Moreover, it proposes an advanced prototype designed to enhance classification accuracy. A comprehensive review of 50 academic papers from well-regarded journals has been conducted, focusing on machine learning and deep learning algorithms. The study evaluates and contrasts various classification models based on their accuracy and effectiveness. To address the identified limitations, an optimized deep learning framework built upon ResNet101 is introduced, attaining an accuracy of 96.88% on an augmented Beijing dataset containing 770 satellite images. This research contributes valuable knowledge on emerging advancements, ongoing challenges, and prospective developments in machine learning and deep learning for landslide detection. It serves as a significant resource for researchers aiming to explore innovative methodologies in this domain.

DOWNLOAD PDF

References

  1. Singh, N., Gupta, S. K., & Shukla, D. P. (2020, February). Analysis of landslide reactivation using satellite data: A case study of Kotrupi landslide, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-3, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-3-w11-137-2020
  2. Pollock, W., & Wartman, J. (2020, October). Human vulnerability to landslides. GeoHealth, 4(10), e2020GH000287. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GH000287
  3. Petley, D. (2012, October). Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology, 40(10), 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1130/G33217.1
  4. Sharma, K. K., & Sapate, S. G. (2022). A prototype model for detection and classification of landslides using satellite data. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2327(1), 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2327/1/012029
  5. Dridi, S. (2021). Unsupervised learning—A systematic literature review [Technical report]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16963.12323
  6. Casagli, N., Cigna, F., Bianchini, S., Hölbling, D., Füreder, P., Righini, G., ... & Bianchi, M. (2016, October). Landslide mapping and monitoring by using radar and optical remote sensing: Examples from the EC-FP7 project SAFER. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 4, 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2016.07.001
  7. Jaber, M. M., Ali, M. H., Abd, S. K., Jassim, M. M., Alkhayyat, A., Alreda, B. A., ... & Alyousif, S. (2022, December). A machine learning-based semantic pattern matching model for remote sensing data registration. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 50(12), 2303–2316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-022-01604-w
  8. Ado, M., Amitab, K., Maji, A. K., Jasińska, E., Gono, R., Leonowicz, Z., & Jasiński, M. (2022, June). Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning: A literature survey. Remote Sensing, 14(13), 3029. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133029
  9. Malviya, U. K., & Gupta, R. (2021, February). Satellite image classification method using ELBP and SVM classifier. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies (ICAECT) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAECT49130.2021.9392509
  10. Byun, Y. G., Han, Y. K., & Chae, T. B. (2013, March). A multispectral image segmentation approach for object-based image classification of high resolution satellite imagery. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(2), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1800-0
  11. Sukawattanavijit, C., Chen, J., & Zhang, H. (2017, March). GA-SVM algorithm for improving land-cover classification using SAR and optical remote sensing data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(3), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2016.2628406
  12. Huang, X., & Zhang, L. (2013, January). An SVM ensemble approach combining spectral, structural, and semantic features for the classification of high-resolution remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(1), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2202912
  13. Shukla, P., Gupta, S., Dubey, C. S., & Thakur, M. (2016). Geo-spatial technology for landslide hazard zonation and prediction. In Environmental Applications of Remote Sensing. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/62667
  14. Sabanci, K., Fahri, M., & Polat, K. (2016, May). Classification of different forest types with machine learning algorithms. Research in Rural Development, 1, 254–260. https://hdl.handle.net/11492/3918
  15. Mianji, F. A., & Zhang, Y. (2011, June). Robust hyperspectral classification using relevance vector machine. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(6), 2100–2112. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2103381
  16. Li, J., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Plaza, A. (2011, October). Hyperspectral image segmentation using a new Bayesian approach with active learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(10), 3947–3960. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2128330
  17. Madapuri, R. K., & Senthil Mahesh, P. C. (2017, December). HBS-CRA: Scaling impact of change request towards fault proneness: Defining a heuristic and biases scale (HBS) of change request artifacts (CRA). Cluster Computing, 22(S5), 11591–11599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1424-0
  18. Dwaram, J. R., & Madapuri, R. K. (2022, September). Crop yield forecasting by long short‐term memory network with Adam optimizer and Huber loss function in Andhra Pradesh, India. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 34(27). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.7310
  19. Reddy, B. S. H. (2025, March). Deep learning-based detection of hair and scalp diseases using CNN and image processing. Milestone Transactions on Medical Technometrics, 3(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14965660
  20. Reddy, B. S. H., Venkatramana, R., & Jayasree, L. (2025). Enhancing apple fruit quality detection with augmented YOLOv3 deep learning algorithm. International Journal of Human Computations & Intelligence, 4(1), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14998944
  21. Ahmed, S. T., Kaladevi, A. C., Shankar, A., & Alqahtani, F. (2025). Privacy Enhanced Edge-AI Healthcare Devices Authentication: A Federated Learning Approach. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.
  22. Singh, K. D., & Ahmed, S. T. (2020, July). Systematic linear word string recognition and evaluation technique. In 2020 international conference on communication and signal processing (ICCSP) (pp. 0545-0548). IEEE.
  23. Syed Thouheed Ahmed, S., Sandhya, M., & Shankar, S. (2018, August). ICT’s role in building and understanding indian telemedicine environment: A study. In Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies: Proceedings of Third International Conference on ICTCS 2017 (pp. 391-397). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  24. Sreedhar Kumar, S., Ahmed, S. T., & NishaBhai, V. B. (2019). Type of supervised text classification system for unstructured text comments using probability theory technique. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(10).
  25. Ahmed, S. T., Basha, S. M., Arumugam, S. R., & Kodabagi, M. M. (2021). Pattern Recognition: An Introduction. MileStone Research Publications.