Spatial-Computational Assessment of Land-Use Strategies Impacting Wildlife and Infrastructure in Dooars Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17044345Keywords:
computation, intelligence systems, graph-theoretic, computer-vision, wildlifeAbstract
The Indian Dooars region, an ecologically rich zone at the Himalayan foothills, is a mosaic of forests, grasslands, riverine systems, and human-modified landscapes. This area is a vital corridor for megafauna such as the Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis), Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), and Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris tigris), yet faces unprecedented pressures from agricultural expansion, infrastructural development, and tourism. This paper presents a computational framework for assessing the effectiveness of land-use policies designed to mitigate the economic and infrastructural impacts on wildlife in the Dooars. Integrating Geographic Information Systems (GIS), multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches, graph-theoretic connectivity models, and predictive conflict mapping, the proposed framework enables policymakers to evaluate policy alternatives before implementation. The methodology is designed to quantify ecological, socio-economic, and infrastructural outcomes in a spatially explicit manner, ensuring that conservation and development objectives can be pursued in tandem. This study focuses on policies such as Joint Forest Management (JFM), Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) delineation, and eco-tourism regulations, exploring their potential to enhance habitat connectivity, reduce human-wildlife conflict, and promote sustainable livelihoods. The analysis emphasizes participatory governance, adaptive policy-making, and the integration of computational insights into real-world decision-making processes.
References
Sarker, D. (2015). Joint forest management in West Bengal: A critical analysis. Indian Journal of Forestry, 38(3), 210–220.
Kumar, S. (2011). Community rights and conservation conflicts: Lessons from Buxa Tiger Reserve. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(23), 485–493.
Chakraborty, A., & Dutta, R. (2018). Eco-sensitive zone management in Eastern India: Policy challenges and opportunities. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(1), 65–78.
Bhattacharya, D. (2019). Sustainable tourism practices in the Eastern Himalayas: A case study of Dooars. Journal of Sustainable Tourism Development, 12(3), 150–165.
Das, P. (2017). Railway infrastructure and elephant mortality in North Bengal. Indian Forester, 143(2), 199–205.
Roy, R. (2021). Human–wildlife conflict and livelihood vulnerability in the Dooars region. Asian Journal of Environment and Development, 25(2), 300–312.
Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 703–726.
Urban, D., & Keitt, T. (2001). Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology, 82(5), 1205–1218.
Barua, M., et al. (2012). The influence of development on human–elephant conflict in Assam, India. Biological Conservation, 153, 56–62.
Margules, C. R., & Pressey, R. L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405(6783), 243–253.
Balmford, A., et al. (2002). Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science, 297(5583), 950–953.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dipayan Samanta, Rabin Kumar Mullick, Rakesh Kumar Mandal, Priyankar Sanphui

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
